RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 26th 2007

From: Ryan, Ray <Ray_Ryan_at_.....>
Date: Thu Oct 25 2007 - 22:12:54 PDT
  
  
  885  _X_ Yes   ___ No    CLOSE 885, covered by 339
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000885        
 
  1384  _X_ Yes   ___ No     
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001384        
 
  1609  _X_ Yes   ___ No  
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001609        
  
  1715  ___ Yes   ___ No  
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001715    
	Abstain    
 
  1723  _X_ Yes   ___ No  
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001723        
  
  1851  _X_ Yes   ___ No  
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001851        
   
  2021  _X_ Yes   ___ No  
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002021        
  
  2055  ___ Yes   _X_ No  
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002055    
	It is not clear there is benefit to outweight the backward
      incompatability.
  
  2113  ___ Yes   _X_ No  
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002113  
	I agree with deleting the associative array reference. I don't
      object to resizing a queue. The modified section 17.5.7
	describes iterative constraints. Section 17.4 describes 
	the resizing of random varaibles and will also need to 
	be modified.     
 
  2137  ___ Yes   ___ No  
  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002137    
	Abstain    
  


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Oct 25 22:13:14 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 25 2007 - 22:13:48 PDT