Hi Neil, I believe there is some overlap between committees here and would not want this issue to fall between the cracks. If we get sv-ac to look at this and they don't have a problem, would you agree to passing it in this committee? I don't think many of the AC people have detailed familiarity with the standard outside of section 16 (I hope I have not insulted anyone - I happen to work with the AC chair, and I think he would agree with me). --Mike Neil Korpusik wrote: > 2137 no > > This should go to the sv-ac. > > > Neil > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Oct 23 17:36:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 23 2007 - 17:36:22 PDT