RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 26th 2007

Steven,

1. I have no preference between the first bins or the last bins. I chose
the last bins only because the existing LRM language also puts the extra
values in the last bin.

2. Do you have a convenient mathematical expression for the current LRM
formula, which has a 'discontinuous' formula?

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Sharp [mailto:sharp@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:02 AM
> To: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com; sv-ec@eda-stds.org; 
> Bresticker, Shalom
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 26th 2007
> 
> Shalom,
> 
> On 2055, I think it would be simpler mathematically if the 
> extra values go into the first bins.  The expression for 
> which bin a value goes into becomes
> 
>   value/((2**M)/N)
> 
> instead of something messier like
> 
>   (((2**M)/N)-1)-((2**M)-value)/((2**M)/N)
> 
> Steven Sharp
> sharp@cadence.com
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.