RE: [sv-ec] Re: Feedback from Freescale on name resolution issues

From: Mark Hartoog <Mark.Hartoog_at_.....>
Date: Mon Oct 22 2007 - 09:19:04 PDT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On 
> Is there any possibility that we could permit the use of 
> "item." in inline constraints, and then decree that if 
> "item." appears *anywhere* in the constraint block, the name 
> binding rules change for the *whole* of the constraint block? 
>  That would permit the current form to be preserved for 
> backward compatibility and, perhaps, for future deprecation.
> --

The only backwards compatibility issue with this is if you have
a class with a field named "item" that is used in a randomize
with statement.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Oct 22 09:19:27 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 22 2007 - 09:19:51 PDT