> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On > Is there any possibility that we could permit the use of > "item." in inline constraints, and then decree that if > "item." appears *anywhere* in the constraint block, the name > binding rules change for the *whole* of the constraint block? > That would permit the current form to be preserved for > backward compatibility and, perhaps, for future deprecation. > -- The only backwards compatibility issue with this is if you have a class with a field named "item" that is used in a randomize with statement. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 22 09:19:27 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 22 2007 - 09:19:51 PDT