RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 26th 2007

From: Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Sat Oct 20 2007 - 07:56:51 PDT
hi EC

I don't have voting rights for the current email vote,
but I've taken a look anyway - herewith some comments
and suggestions that may be relevant.

1384
~~~~
The second part of this proposal (the part affecting
clause 11) interacts somewhat with 1707, which we passed
a little while ago.  I suspect the required changes are
obvious and editorial only, but I'm not quite sure how
we're supposed to proceed in a situation like this - 
do we need explicit new proposal text?

1723
~~~~
Grammatical nit-pick: the "correction" of 'is' to 'are'
in the first sentence of the proposal is incorrect,
since that verb's subject is the singular "syntax"
rather than the pair of methods.

2055
~~~~
Friendly amendment: in both places where the proposal has
"then the last (.... modulo N) bins shall include an 
additional value", it would be more elegant and clearer
to write "then *each of* the last (... modulo N) bins 
shall include *one* additional value".

-- 
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant

DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services

Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223                   Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573                           Web: http://www.doulos.com

The contents of this message may contain personal views which 
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat Oct 20 07:57:34 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 20 2007 - 07:58:14 PDT