Mantis 2055 mentions a modified formula to be used for coverage bin distribution specifically for section 18.5.2, which deals with automatic bins. The distribution technique for sized vector bins (ref the underlined line shown in the excerpt below) is different from the distribution scheme described in Mantis 2055. Is this difference intended or both these distribution schemes should match so that we have a consistent bin distribution method? Regds, Swapnajit. ---------------------------excerpt from P1800-2008-draft3aPROTECTED.pdf (section 18.5) ------------------------------------------ If a fixed number of bins is specified and that number is smaller than the specified number of values, then the possible bin values are uniformly distributed among the specified bins. The first 'n' specified values are assigned to the first bin, the next 'n' specified values are assigned to the next bin, etc. Duplicate values are retained; thus the same value can be assigned to multiple bins. If the number of values is not divisible by the number of bins, then the last bin will include the remaining items. For example: bins fixed [4] = {1:10, 1, 4, 7}; The 13 possible values are distributed as follows: <1,2,3>, <4,5,6>, <7,8,9>, <10,1,4,7>. If the number of bins exceeds the number of values, then some of the bins will be empty. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Oct 18 03:22:22 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 18 2007 - 03:22:55 PDT