Hi folks, Is it intended to be able to constrain and randomize the size of an associative array? Draft 4 sec. 17.4 p385 paragraph 3 talks about constraining the size of a dynamic array, but not an associative array. In the absence of any other language, one would naturally assume that the intention was not to allow constraining the size of an associative array. However, section 17.5.7 p.393 paragraph 6 uses very similar language, but does include associative arrays. If the intent is to allow randomizing the size of an associative array, I'd like to hear how it was supposed to work - I'm having trouble imagining anything useful, particularly for non-integral index types. On the other hand, it would certainly be useful for associative array randomization to preserve existing size and indices, and only randomize the values. If there's a mantis on this already, I'd like to address it in this round. If not, I'd like to know so I can submit one. Thanks, Mike -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Oct 10 18:34:54 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 10 2007 - 18:35:17 PDT