1594 - NO I don't have any objection to what is intended, but the wording says: ...the operator compares the values of the class objects... I think we should say "class object handles" here so that there is no confusion about interpreting this as a member-wise comparison. With the word "handles" added, I would vote "yes". Sorry about noticing this so late; I should have caught this much earlier. Yes on the remainder. Gord Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote: > Hi, > Based on October 1 2007 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting > an email vote on the following mantis items: > > 339 1336 1384 1560 1594 1608 1615 1679 1715 1871 1897 1928 > 2007 > > Operating guidelines for sv-ec email vote: > - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight October 10 2007) > - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least > half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. > - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason. > This issue will then be up for discussion at the next conference call. > - Please indicate any friendly amendment that you think will change > your vote to a YES, this will help with completing our task. > > - Notes: > * 1615: the vote for mantis item 1615 is to close it, covered by 1336. > * 1928: re-approve. If needed sv-ec can open another mantis item > > As of the October 1 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are (total 15): > > Arturo Salz, > Cliff Cummings > Dave Rich > Francoise Martinolle > Gordon Vreugdenhil > Neil Korpusik > Ray Ryan > Steven Sharp > Stu Sutherland > Heath Chambers > Don Mills > Mark Hartoog > Geoffrey Coram > David Scott > Mike Burns > > > Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a reason. > Send it to the reflector. > > 339 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000339 > > 1336 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001336 > > 1384 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001384 > > 1560 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001560 > > 1594 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001594 > > 1608 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001608 > > 1615 ___ Yes ___ No CLOSE 1615, covered by 1336 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001615 > > 1679 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001679 > > 1715 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001715 > > 1871 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001871 > > 1897 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001897 > > 1928 ___ Yes ___ No Re-approve. If needed open other mantis > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001928 > > 2007 ___ Yes ___ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002007 > > > > 339 typos in queue methods > 1336 Rules for allowed statements in a function > 1384 bit stream cast and pack/unpack for protected./local members > 1560 Queue delete() method for entire array > 1594 conditional operator for class handles incorrect > 1608 equality, inequality and conditional operator rules for class > handles > 1615 can processes spawned by functions execute blocking statements? > 1679 string casting statement unclear > 1715 Triggered property of a clocking block > 1871 clarification needed for illegal/ignore transition bins > 1897 clarify "union of all significant bins" and "overlapping bins" in > coverage computation > 1928 clarification of coverpoint value resolution (18.5.6) > 2007 7.9.4: rules about int type index for associative arrays > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Oct 4 14:08:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 04 2007 - 14:10:39 PDT