RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 10th 2007

Medhi,

Is the intent to re-approve 1928 with no change and to reject all the
champions' comments?

Also, 2055 is ready for voting.

Thanks,
Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Mehdi Mohtashemi
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 5:17 AM
> To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 10th 2007
> 
> Hi,
> Based on October 1 2007 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting an 
> email vote on the following mantis items:
> 
>  339  1336  1384  1560  1594  1608  1615  1679  1715  1871  1897  1928
> 2007
> 
> Operating guidelines for sv-ec email vote:
> - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight October 10 2007)
> - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least
>   half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote.
> - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason.
>   This issue will then be up for discussion at the next 
> conference call.
> - Please indicate any friendly amendment that you think will change
>   your vote to a YES, this will help with completing our task.
> 
> - Notes: 
>   * 1615: the vote for mantis item 1615 is to close it, 
> covered by 1336.
>   * 1928: re-approve. If needed sv-ec can open another mantis item
> 
> As of the October 1 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are (total 15):
> 
> Arturo Salz,
> Cliff Cummings         
> Dave Rich           
> Francoise Martinolle
> Gordon Vreugdenhil
> Neil Korpusik      
> Ray Ryan
> Steven Sharp
> Stu Sutherland
> Heath Chambers
> Don Mills
> Mark Hartoog
> Geoffrey Coram    
> David Scott     
> Mike Burns
> 
> 
> Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a reason. 
> Send it to the reflector.
> 
> 339  ___ Yes   ___ No     
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000339        
> 
> 1336  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001336        
> 
> 1384  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001384        
> 
> 1560  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001560        
> 
> 1594  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001594        
> 
> 1608  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001608        
> 
> 1615  ___ Yes   ___ No    CLOSE 1615, covered by 1336
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001615        
> 
> 1679  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001679        
> 
> 1715  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001715        
> 
> 1871  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001871        
> 
> 1897  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001897        
> 
> 1928  ___ Yes   ___ No    Re-approve. If needed open other mantis
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001928        
> 
> 2007  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002007        
> 
> 
> 
>  339   typos in queue methods
> 1336   Rules for allowed statements in a function
> 1384   bit stream cast and pack/unpack for protected./local members
> 1560   Queue delete() method for entire array 
> 1594  conditional operator for class handles incorrect
> 1608  equality, inequality and conditional operator rules for class
> handles
> 1615   can processes spawned by functions execute blocking statements?
> 1679   string casting statement unclear 
> 1715   Triggered property of a clocking block 
> 1871   clarification needed for illegal/ignore transition bins
> 1897   clarify "union of all significant bins" and 
> "overlapping bins" in
> coverage computation 
> 1928   clarification of coverpoint value resolution (18.5.6)
> 2007   7.9.4: rules about int type index for associative arrays
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.