Re: [sv-ec] New proposal for Mantis 0001556: in-line static variable initialization - require keyword static?

Hi Dave,

Looks good. Can you add an example and counter-example for class member
functions?

If I understand the issue correctly, tasks and functions declared as
automatic could have both static and automatic (stack based) variables, so
static would not be required on all initialized variables.

Take Care,
Mike

On 9/13/07, Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich@mentor.com> wrote:
>
>  A new proposal has been uploaded with a new example. The example has been
> split into two modules, one legal and the other illegal. All implementation
> dependencies (race conditions) have been removed.
>
>
>
> David Rich
> Verification Technologist
> Design Verification & Test Division
> Mentor Graphics Corporation
> dave_rich@mentor.com
> Office:   408 487-7206
> Cell:     510 589-2625
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.