I don't have a problem with this particular case, but I think we have also seen cases where general, inclusive language has included cases that turned out to be problematic and we said that we should have listed just cases that we know to be safe. > I see no reason for a restriction. This is the problem we > always run into when we try to list features exhaustively: we > forget something. Shalom -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Sep 5 02:39:04 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 05 2007 - 02:39:45 PDT