Yes, Shalom's comments represent the consensus of the champions. -- Brad -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 11:01 AM To: Geoffrey.Coram; Neil.Korpusik@Sun.com Cc: sv-ec Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Feedback from the Champions Actually, my comments were part of my feedback as a Champion. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Geoffrey.Coram > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 8:12 PM > To: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.com > Cc: SV_EC List > Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Feedback from the Champions > > The amendments to 1789 were suggested by Shalom, not by the Champions, > and all of them were already included in the latest version of the > proposal, which Mehdi uploaded for me (because the issue was resolved, > I couldn't do it myself). > > SV-1789_ext_forD3a.html > http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2225&type=bug > > -Geoffrey -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Aug 20 11:07:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:07:18 PDT