Yes to both On 7/24/07, Mehdi Mohtashemi <Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com> wrote: > > > Based on July 23rd, 2007 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting > an email vote on the following mantis items. > 1857 and 1897. > > Please note that the operating guidelines are: > - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight July 31st 2007) > - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least > half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. > - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason. > This issue will then be up for discussion at the > next conference call. > > As of the July 23 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are (total 15): > > Arturo Salz, > Cliff Cummings > Dave Rich > David Scott > Francoise Martinolle > Geoffrey Coram > Gordon Vreugdenhil > Heath Chambers > Jonathan Bromley > Mark Hartoog > Michael Mintz > Neil Korpusik > Ray Ryan > Steven Sharp > Stu Sutherland > > Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a reason. > Send it to the reflector. > > 1587 ___ Yes ___ No > 1897 ___ Yes ___ No > > 1857 external method definitions and parameterized class types > http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001857 > 1897 clarify "union of all significant bins" and "overlapping bins" in > coverage computation > http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001897 > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jul 24 09:11:23 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 24 2007 - 09:11:33 PDT