>From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv@model.com> >So, why not make a decision on that aspect in the LRM? It seems >reasonably obvious to me that "disable" targets a specific task -- >if the task addressing goes through a virtual reference to the >actual task that should be fine. I agree that this seems most natural from the internal logic of the language: use the virtual reference mechanism to select a particular task implementation, and then apply the disable to that. However, that doesn't mean that this makes sense from a user viewpoint. If this is never going to be useful, I wouldn't waste time implementing it in a tool, and don't see a reason for having it in the language. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jul 19 17:50:21 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:50:29 PDT