Re: [sv-ec] disable class method

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:49:59 PDT
>From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv@model.com>

>So, why not make a decision on that aspect in the LRM?  It seems
>reasonably obvious to me that "disable" targets a specific task --
>if the task addressing goes through a virtual reference to the
>actual task that should be fine.

I agree that this seems most natural from the internal logic of
the language: use the virtual reference mechanism to select a
particular task implementation, and then apply the disable to that.
However, that doesn't mean that this makes sense from a user
viewpoint.  If this is never going to be useful, I wouldn't waste
time implementing it in a tool, and don't see a reason for having
it in the language.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jul 19 17:50:21 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:50:29 PDT