Hi Geoffrey, We will continue the email vote. Everyone that has already voted will be given a chance to change their vote based on the new proposal. Everyone should now be reviewing the latest proposal that has been posted for mantis 1789. The following people voted in favor of the original proposal, they can either repost their vote for the latest proposal or they can wait for the next conference call to express an opinion on it. Since the proposal was updated during the open voting period we will need to confirm that those that already voted are still ok with the proposal. Cliff, Gordon, Jonathan, Geoffrey Neil Geoffrey.Coram wrote On 06/18/07 08:57,: > I'm not sure the procedure for this: if it's a friendly > amendment, does the current e-mail vote apply, or do we > need a new one? > > -Geoffrey > > > > Jonathan Bromley wrote: > >>Geoffrey, >> >> >>>I've uploaded "prop1789_ext_do.html" to use >>>Shalom's suggestion of "data object" -- >>>does this work for you, Jonathan? >> >>I like that much better - I hope others don't find it too verbose. I note that >>Shalom has also filed a separate Mantis (1845) for roughly the same >>wordsmithing issue in many places throughout the LRM. >>-- >>Jonathan > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Jun 18 15:50:36 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 18 2007 - 15:51:20 PDT