IMHO there method call definition in SV is a little messy. Sometimes SV want methods to be called wihtout parathensis IE <sequence>.triggered Sometimes you can use both versions: <enum>.next; <enum>.next(2); or even : <enum>.next(); Maybe it is good idea to make this situation clear like in other languages: - methods always have to be called with parathensis (if no arguments then empty parathensis), - properties are referenced without parathensis This even allow to have methods and properties with the same name, and make code more readable. best regards, DANiel -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu May 31 01:32:30 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 31 2007 - 01:33:09 PDT