RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote (part 2) Closes 12am PST May 2 2007

From: Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 11:04:28 PDT
> I like 1715.  It is good for consistency 

Yeah, me too, but when everyone agreed it was a bad idea
to allow (cb) to be assigned to an event handle, I thought
it wasn't worth the bother of fighting for it.  I can easily

  clocking cb @(...); endclocking
  event cb_e;
  always @(cb) -> cb_e;

And now I can pass references to cb_e around the place,
wait on cb_e.triggered, and so on.  I'm happy (ish).
I have lost nothing - my input clockvars are already 
updated when @cb_e fires, and I still have plenty of
time left in the timeslot to drive my output clockvars.
And I can remotely mimic ##0 using wait(cb_e.triggered).
-- 
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant

DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services

Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223                   Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573                           Web: http://www.doulos.com

The contents of this message may contain personal views which 
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Apr 30 11:05:00 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 30 2007 - 11:05:10 PDT