Re: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote (part 1) Closes 12am PST April 24th

From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik_at_.....>
Date: Sat Apr 21 2007 - 17:49:51 PDT
1707  ___ Yes   _X_ No

   a. The new description doesn't seem to match the examples in one respect

      "This generic stream is then sliced into blocks with the specified number
      of bits starting with the left-most bit."

      The examples seem to be showing that the slicing operation is dependent
      upon which streaming operator is used.

         { << 4 { 6'b11_0101 }} // generates stream 'b0101_11
         { >> 4 { 6'b11_0101 }} // generates stream 'b1101_01 (same)

   b. One friendly ammendment.

      From:
        ...assembled in to a generic...
      To:
        ...assembled into a generic...


Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote On 04/17/07 15:21,:
>  
> Based on April 16th, 2007 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting an 
> email vote on the following mantis items. 
> 1655, 1732, 1777, 1371, 1384, 1707, 1680, 1427, 1723, 1736.  
> Part 2 of email vote will start next week.
> 
> Please note that the operating guidelines are:
> - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight April 24th 2007)
> - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least
>   half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote.
> - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason.
>   This issue will then be up for discussion at the 
>   next conference call.
> 
> As of the April 16th meeting, the eligible voters are (total 11):
> 
> Arturo Salz,
> Cliff Cummings         
> Dave Rich   
> Don Mills
> Doug Warmke        
> Heath Chambers
> Mark Hartoog
> Michael Mintz
> Neil Korpusik      
> Ray Ryan        
> Stu Sutherland
> 
> Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a reason. 
> Send it to the reflector.
> 
> 1655  ___ Yes   ___ No   
> 1732  ___ Yes   ___ No 
> 1777  ___ Yes   ___ No 
> 1371  ___ Yes   ___ No 
> 1384  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1707  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1680  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1427  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1723  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1736  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat Apr 21 17:50:18 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 21 2007 - 17:50:37 PDT