Re: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote (part 1) Closes 12am PST April 24th

1384  ___ Yes   _X_ No

   Sub-clause 4.16 Bit-stream casting, the following text has been added

      An associative array or class shall be illegal as a destination type. A
      class handle with local or protected members shall be illegal as a source
      type except when the handle is the current instance this. (See 7.10 and
      7.17).

   a. If these restrictions are added, they should be placed earlier in this
      sub-clause. The text that comes earlier in this sub-clause is written
      as though these restrictions don't exist.

   b. I don't see the need for part of the first restriction

         An associative array or class shall be illegal as a destination type.

      Why are classes not allowed as a destination type? Null handles shouldn't
      be allowed, but why not a handle that refers to an instantiated object?

      If classes are allowed as a destination type, the following should be
      added to 4.16.

         Reconstruction does not modify any internal properties in the target
         class object.



Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote On 04/17/07 15:21,:
>  
> Based on April 16th, 2007 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting an 
> email vote on the following mantis items. 
> 1655, 1732, 1777, 1371, 1384, 1707, 1680, 1427, 1723, 1736.  
> Part 2 of email vote will start next week.
> 
> Please note that the operating guidelines are:
> - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight April 24th 2007)
> - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least
>   half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote.
> - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason.
>   This issue will then be up for discussion at the 
>   next conference call.
> 
> As of the April 16th meeting, the eligible voters are (total 11):
> 
> Arturo Salz,
> Cliff Cummings         
> Dave Rich   
> Don Mills
> Doug Warmke        
> Heath Chambers
> Mark Hartoog
> Michael Mintz
> Neil Korpusik      
> Ray Ryan        
> Stu Sutherland
> 
> Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a reason. 
> Send it to the reflector.
> 
> 1655  ___ Yes   ___ No   
> 1732  ___ Yes   ___ No 
> 1777  ___ Yes   ___ No 
> 1371  ___ Yes   ___ No 
> 1384  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1707  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1680  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1427  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1723  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 1736  ___ Yes   ___ No  
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.