[sv-ec] RE: comments on 890-8

Thanks Jonathan -

I didn't make the "during the Observed" region change in 
SV-890-9-part1.pdf, but I think that could be added in with
a friendly amendment during the meeting on Monday.

SV-EC -

Unfortunately I won't be able to attend the SV-EC on this
coming Monday due to the fact that I'll be on an airplane.

The latest proposal takes into account Jonathan and Neil's
comments. It has been uploaded into Mantis (SV-890-9-part1.pdf).
See http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000890.

I don't know of any other changes that have been requested
other than that minor wording issue above.

Thanks to everyone who helped out and contributed to the
effort on 890!

Best regards,
Doug

P.S.  Don't go too far into a corner Jonathan, we'll want you
      back promptly.  Hopefully on easier Mantis items. :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Bromley [mailto:jonathan.bromley@doulos.com] 
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 1:36 AM
> To: Warmke, Doug; sv-ec@eda-stds.org
> Subject: RE: comments on 890-8
> 
> Doug,
> 
> > sorry I didn't grok your comments here a bit better.  
> 
> no apology required - I think I'm happy to agree that the current
> text captures the intent adequately; in most cases I was just 
> fiddling around trying to make it easier to understand for
> ordinary foot-soldiers like me.  And I was completely wrong
> about my concern over assertions clocked by @cb; as you
> and Gord have both pointed out to me, it's not an issue.
> 
> > "at the end of Observed" could probably be rephrased.
> > "during the Observed" might be fine.
> 
> I think I would be happier with that change.
> 
> > > 15.14.2 Driving clocking output signals
> > > I think we've already looked at the issue of glitches when 
> > > there are multiple passes through Re-NBA.  The paragraph 
> > > beginning "It is possible for the scheduling loop described
> > > in 9-1" seems again to deliver an unjustified statement[...]
> > DOUG: Why is the statement unjustified?
> 
> I don't dispute the statement; only that, as a reader, I 
> couldn't easily see how it was derived.  I'm always a little
> nervous about appeal to examples in normative text.  However,
> if everyone else is OK with it I'm more than happy to concede
> and disappear back into my pedantic little corner like Eeyore.
> 
> Many thanks again for all your efforts.
> -- 
> Jonathan Bromley, Consultant
> 
> DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
> VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services
> 
> Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, 
> Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK
> Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223                   Email: 
> jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
> Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573                           Web: 
> http://www.doulos.com
> 
> The contents of this message may contain personal views which 
> are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.