Hi SV-EC, I decided to go ahead and incorporate Jonathan's detailed and valuable comments into the 890 proposal. Now, SV-890-6.pdf is available in the attachments section of http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000890 Only one of Jonathan's comments is still unaddressed. Namely the wording of the paragraphs discussing the lhs vs. rhs intra-assignment usage of the cycle_delay (##) operator. We'll continue to hash that out and hopefully get it resolved in 890-7. Please take a look. Regards, Doug -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Feb 14 23:13:49 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 14 2007 - 23:14:17 PST