>From: "Arturo Salz" <Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com> >Yes. I do have a reason: > The copy constructor implies that an object should be copied. And that copy inherently involves dereferencing the handle, which is an error for a null handle. There is a big difference between copying a null handle, and copying what that handle points to. The first is legal, and the second is an error. I agree with Arturo on this one. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jan 18 16:07:39 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 16:07:45 PST