Hi, Rob - I will take the first stab at discussing use cases and requirements and allow others to add their perspective. First let me offer an editorial comment on programs and clocking blocks and programs. Due to the ambiguous descriptions in sections 15 (clocking blocks) and 16 (programs) in the LRM, I believe you will find significant differences in current implementations of programs and clocking blocks. This is why we are having this rather urgent discussion to fix the ambiguities and to determine the perceived use models for programs and clocking blocks. I am not surprised that you having "challenges." You are not alone and I would be happy to compare usage notes with you off-line. Use Models: Largely based on Vera and the Vera interface (clocking block equivalent). Event scheduling is based on user experiences with Vera. Program - execute testbench code in different event regions than RTL designs with the intent to eliminate DUT-testbench race conditions (this was the goal and I think we are close). Major implementers noted some of the troubles they had experienced integrating third-party HVLs (such as Vera and 'e') with Verilog simulations through the PLI. PLI - make the need to use PLI in a testbench obsolete or near-obsolete. Interaction with other languages was not well considered. Steve Sharp is off exploring those issues as related to event scheduling. Did you see my PDF slides showing Verilog-2001 testbench strategies versus SystemVerilog strategies? The slides were used in our face-to-face meeting on November 6th. Editorial Comment: I believe many of the examples in the clocking and program sections are much too terse to be instructive and I have requested permission to add more detailed examples to show correct usage and how interaction really takes place. What we are seeking from you are your use examples and why they are causing you grief. If you mention that the implementations do not track, that is already known and will not be very useful. If you tell us how you tried to use the constructs and what you expected when you executed your examples, that will be immensely valuable, as it will show the ideas and misconceptions surrounding these new features and will give us a clue on how to improve the features or their descriptions. Regards - Cliff At 05:14 AM 12/6/2006, Slater Rob-R53680 wrote: >Hi, > >Sorry for the step backwards, but in light of the challenges program >blocks are presenting us, I went looking for the Use Cases & >Requirements that drove this particular design decision. > >Could someone point me to where they are documented? > >Thanks, > >Rob Slater >Freescale Semiconductor ---------------------------------------------------- Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc. 14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486 cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com Expert Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification TrainingReceived on Wed Dec 6 12:03:40 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 06 2006 - 12:04:07 PST