RE: [sv-ec] fork...join_none in functions, and final blocks

> 
> There are some problems with the existing text for 1615 that I think
> need to be cleaned up with a further proposal.  I think that the limit
> on executing fork..join_none should be expressed in terms of the kind
> of process executing it, not the original ancestry of that process.
> Expressing it in terms of the original ancestry actually allows things
> that were supposed to be disallowed, and disallows some 
> things that are
> reasonable.  
> 

Hi Steven,

Could you please clarify the difference between your terms
"kind" of a process and "original ancestry" of a process?

Also, if you could give a few examples of things that were supposed
to be disallowed, and things that are reasonable, that would be
helpful to my understanding of this topic.

Thank you,
Doug