> The discussion on whether fork...join_none is legal has > been settled; that is Mantis item 1615. Thanks. I'm not very good at keeping track of these things... > With regards to final blocks, I don't believe allowing fork..join_none in functions adds anything new. > [...] Evidently, processes triggered (or indirectly spawned) > from within a final block are not executed, OK, that makes perfect sense. It's a potential trap for users though; an obligation on trainers like me to ensure that our trainees are aware of it! Thanks for the clarifications -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.Received on Sat Nov 25 02:49:17 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Nov 25 2006 - 02:49:48 PST