<forwarding email from Daniel M.> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: List of port expressions Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:56:21 +0100 From: danielm <danielm@aldec.com.pl> To: owner-sv-ec@eda.org SV defines list of port expressions (19.9). This is defined only for ANSI style headers. This is mistake in syntax production? port ::= [ port expression ] | . port identifier ( [ port_expression ] ) ansi_port_declaration ::= [ net_port_header | interface_port_header ] port_identifier { unpacked_dimension } | [ variable_port_header ] port_identifier { variable_dimension } [ = constant_expression ] | [ net_port_header | variable_port_header ] . port_identifier ( [ expression ] ) Diference in ANSI_port and port definition which I dont understand is: -for ANSI: port_identifier ( [ expression ] - for nonANSI :. port_identifier ( [ port_expression ] ) Port expression is limited only to port reference. So according to LRM I cannot have in non ANSI style: module(.a(sig[0])); /* input a; wire [1:0] sig; endmodule But in ANSI style i can have: module(input .a(sig[0]));/** wire [1:0] sig; endmodule Question is : is really (*) forbidden? DANielReceived on Fri Nov 10 11:19:31 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 10 2006 - 11:19:43 PST