Well, that is the question, but I think that is different from what Francoise was saying. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On > Behalf Of Arturo Salz > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 6:07 PM > To: Bresticker, Shalom; Francoise Martinolle; sv-ec@server.eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index > > Shalom, > > I'm sorry, but I believe the sentence quoted by Brad is clear. > > Indexing and associative array by an enum value that lies outside the > enumeration's set is no different than indexing a regular (static) array > by an out-of-bounds index. The behavior in either case is to return the > default value of the element type. > > Arturo > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Bresticker, Shalom > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 8:26 AM > To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-ec@eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index > > You are not reading the index value, you read the data value of the > indexed entry. > > Shalom > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Francoise Martinolle [mailto:fm@cadence.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:22 PM > > To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-ec@eda.org > > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index > > > > > > That is not clear what "array type" means. I interpreted it to the > > the array index type, you interpreted it to the the array element > type. > > > > Francoise > > ' > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 11:18 AM > > To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-ec@eda.org > > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index > > > > Yes, but that is where the enum is the element type, not the index > type, > > I think. > > > > Shalom > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] > > On > > > Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle > > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:12 PM > > > To: Steven Sharp; sv-ec@server.eda.org; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com > > > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index > > > > > > The table 5.9.1 states that the default initial value for the base > > type > > > of the enum type should be > > > returned for a non existing array index. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of > > > Steven Sharp > > > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 6:14 PM > > > To: sv-ec@eda.org; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com > > > Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index > > > > > > > > > >From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com> > > > > > > >If the index type of an associative array is an enumeration type, > and > > > > > >an expression not equivalent to the enum type is used instead, such > > as > > > >integer, is that an error? I hope so and that the expression would > > > >need to be cast. > > > > > > I would assume so. It says that indices larger or smaller than the > > > index type get truncated or extended, but that is the normal > implicit > > > conversion for integral types. There is not an implicit conversion > > from > > > an integer to an enum, so I agree that that should be an error. > > > > > > > > > >If an expression is cast to the enumeration type, but does not have > a > > > > > >valid value for that enumeration type, is this treated as in 5.9.6? > > > >That is, return default initial value on read and do nothing on > > write? > > > > > > That is one possible way it could be defined. A simpler way would > be > > to > > > just use the value given, and do reads and writes normally. Your > > > suggestion would require an extra run-time value check before every > > > access to the AA. > > > > > > What would be the most likely uses of an AA with an enum index? > That > > > might tell us what the desired behavior would be, and whether the > > extra > > > cost is justified. > > > > > > Steven Sharp > > > sharp@cadence.comReceived on Mon Oct 23 09:09:31 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 23 2006 - 09:09:35 PDT