RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index

You are not reading the index value, you read the data value of the
indexed entry.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francoise Martinolle [mailto:fm@cadence.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:22 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index
> 
> 
> That is not clear what "array type" means. I interpreted it to the
> the array index type, you interpreted it to the the array element
type.
> 
> Francoise
>     '
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 11:18 AM
> To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index
> 
> Yes, but that is where the enum is the element type, not the index
type,
> I think.
> 
> Shalom
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:12 PM
> > To: Steven Sharp; sv-ec@server.eda.org; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index
> >
> >  The table 5.9.1 states that the default initial value for the base
> type
> > of the enum type should be
> > returned for a non existing array index.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> > Steven Sharp
> > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 6:14 PM
> > To: sv-ec@eda.org; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com
> > Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Associative array with enum index
> >
> >
> > >From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
> >
> > >If the index type of an associative array is an enumeration type,
and
> 
> > >an expression not equivalent to the enum type is used instead, such
> as
> > >integer, is that an error?  I hope so and that the expression would
> > >need to be cast.
> >
> > I would assume so.  It says that indices larger or smaller than the
> > index type get truncated or extended, but that is the normal
implicit
> > conversion for integral types.  There is not an implicit conversion
> from
> > an integer to an enum, so I agree that that should be an error.
> >
> >
> > >If an expression is cast to the enumeration type, but does not have
a
> 
> > >valid value for that enumeration type, is this treated as in 5.9.6?
> > >That is, return default initial value on read and do nothing on
> write?
> >
> > That is one possible way it could be defined.  A simpler way would
be
> to
> > just use the value given, and do reads and writes normally.  Your
> > suggestion would require an extra run-time value check before every
> > access to the AA.
> >
> > What would be the most likely uses of an AA with an enum index?
That
> > might tell us what the desired behavior would be, and whether the
> extra
> > cost is justified.
> >
> > Steven Sharp
> > sharp@cadence.com