Re: [sv-ec] Arrays of events

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Tue Sep 12 2006 - 14:04:19 PDT
>From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>

>Is this simply a BNF oversight or is this an intentional omission. Seems
>to me that if you can declare an array of events, you should be able to
>trigger an element of an array.

I don't see any possible use for an array of events if you can't trigger
one of them.

BTW, there are some issues with arrays of events that were not considered
when they were added in 1364.  They appear because of the possibility that
the event referenced by an array reference could change if the value of
the index changes.  The same issue occurs in 1800 with the ability to
assign an event to another event.  You have to define what it means to
wait on an event in that situation.  There is no analog in the rules for
other things in event controls, because those are based on whether the
value changed, and named events do not have values.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Tue Sep 12 14:04:23 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 12 2006 - 14:04:41 PDT