>From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com> >Is this simply a BNF oversight or is this an intentional omission. Seems >to me that if you can declare an array of events, you should be able to >trigger an element of an array. I don't see any possible use for an array of events if you can't trigger one of them. BTW, there are some issues with arrays of events that were not considered when they were added in 1364. They appear because of the possibility that the event referenced by an array reference could change if the value of the index changes. The same issue occurs in 1800 with the ability to assign an event to another event. You have to define what it means to wait on an event in that situation. There is no analog in the rules for other things in event controls, because those are based on whether the value changed, and named events do not have values. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue Sep 12 14:04:23 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 12 2006 - 14:04:41 PDT