RE: [sv-ec] Cliff's 1308 email No-vote - See attached example

> 
> Yes - I had faulty reasoning here. Thanks. After I read the
> explanation, I realized that I had forgotten about once-virtual,
> always-virtual. Seems like a good coding guideline would be to
> override virtual methods with another mothod declared as virtual,
> even though it is not required.
> 
[DR>] Cliff,

I am told C++ users do declare their virtual method overrides using the
'virtual' keyword and omit the keyword to indicate "don't override me
anymore" as a coding convention.

Dave