1308 Clarifications needed for Abstract classes and virtual methods 1308 _X__ Yes ___ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001308 In addition to Francoise's corrections, I'd like to propose the following friendly amendment (I find the existing verbiage confusing). An object of an abstract class shall not be constructed directly. It may be indirectly constructed Its constructor method may only be called indirectly through the chaining of constructors originating in an extended non-abstract subclass object. Arturo -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Mehdi Mohtashemi Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 4:15 AM To: sv-ec@eda.org Subject: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST April 4th 2006 Hi, Based on March 27, 2006 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting an email vote on the following mantis item, 1308. Please note that the operating guidelines are: - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight April 4, 2006) - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason. This issue will then be up for discussion at the next conference call. As of the March 27th meeting, the eligible voters are (total 11): Arturo Salz, Cliff Cummings Dave Rich Francoise Martinolle Gordon Vreugdenhil Neil Korpusik Phil Moorby Ray Ryan Steven Sharp Stuart Sutherland Surrendra Dudani Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a reason. Send it to the reflector. 1308 Clarifications needed for Abstract classes and virtual methods 1308 ___ Yes ___ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001308Received on Tue Mar 28 21:41:14 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 28 2006 - 21:41:28 PST