[sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast.

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich_at_.....>
Date: Mon Mar 13 2006 - 11:12:52 PST

I think the answer should be yes, and this should be an erratum in the
LRM.

 

David Rich
Verification Technologist
Design Verification & Test Division
Mentor Graphics Corporation
dave_rich@mentor.com
Office:   408 487-7206
Cell:     510 589-2625

Received on Mon Mar 13 11:13:04 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "[sv-ec] Issues with parameters which denote $"
Previous message: Ryan, Ray: "RE: [sv-ec] should shallow copy of a class instance copy the rand_mode settings?"
Next in thread: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast."
Maybe reply: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast."
Maybe reply: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast."
Maybe reply: Arturo Salz: "RE: [sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast."
Maybe reply: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast."
Maybe reply: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast."
Maybe reply: Arturo Salz: "RE: [sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast."
Maybe reply: Rich, Dave: "RE: [sv-ec] Q: Should local or protected members of a class be excluded from a bit stream cast."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 13 2006 - 11:13:08 PST