[sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] division of responsibilities

Shalom,
I am not sure but I think you meant chapter 17?
.I think if the construct is used only in SVA then it should probably be
owned by sv-ac. If it is general purpose then SV-EC or sv-BC?
For clocking blocks it depends upon the issue and same for coverage.
Can you describe the issue ?
 
Thanks
-Faisal


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Bresticker, Shalom
	Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 12:41 AM
	To: sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ac] division of responsibilities
	
	
	  

	Hi,

	I'd like to get clarification of the division of
responsibilities between SV-AC and SV-EC.

	Specifically, are all issues outside of Clause 17 the
responsibility of SV-EC (or one of the others)?

	If SV-AC has issues related to clocking blocks or coverage, do
they need to go through SV-EC?

	 

	Thanks,

	Shalom

	 

	Shalom Bresticker

	Intel Jerusalem LAD DA

	+972 2 589-6852

	+972 54 721-1033

	I don't represent Intel