Re: [sv-ec] Missing BNF for parameterized virtual interfaces

The Mantis item is

    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1330

Also, as reported in http://eda.org/sv-ec/hm/2897.html ,
the dot before modport_identifier should be red.

-- Brad
  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Rich, Dave
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 9:19 AM
To: Steven Sharp
Cc: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Missing BNF for parameterized virtual interfaces

A new proposal has been uploaded to address this issue, nested
interfaces, and issues that pop up due to hierarchical references within
the interface. (i.e. an interface with interface ports that import a
type)

Dave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Sharp [mailto:sharp@cadence.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 11:44 AM
> To: sharp@cadence.com; sv-ec@eda.org; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com; Rich,
Dave
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Missing BNF for parameterized virtual interfaces
> 
> 
> >From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>
> 
> >I suggest closing 1324 since I submitted a proposal and you didn't.
:P
> 
> I have no problem with that.
> 
> Erratum 1324 does also mention the issue that different instances of
> the "same" interface could be bound to different interface definitions
> by mechanisms such as configs.  It needs to be clear that these
> different instances of the "same" interface are not actually the same
> type.  I don't believe that this is covered by Erratum 1330.
> 
> Steven Sharp
> sharp@cadence.com