RE: [sv-ec] Effect of ignore/illegal bins - Mantis #1237

From: Ryan, Ray <Ray_Ryan_at_.....>
Date: Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:28:52 PST
 
Arturo,

I agree with your friendly amendments. The changes do read better.

I have updated the mantis proposal with your modified proposal.

Thanks,
Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arturo Salz [mailto:Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:34 AM
> To: Ryan, Ray; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Effect of ignore/illegal bins - Mantis #1237
> 
> Ray,
> 
> Attached is a modified proposal with some minor friendly amendments.
> The amendments do not change the proposal's semantics, only 
> the verbiage.
> 
> 	Arturo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ryan, Ray
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:29 PM
> To: sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ec] Effect of ignore/illegal bins - Mantis #1237
> 
> Attached is a proposal for mantix #1237. 
> 
> - values are distributed, then ignore/illegal bins applied.
> - bins with no values/transitions do not contribute to coverage
> - coverpoint with no contributing bins does not contribute to coverage
> - covergroup with no contributing items does not contribute 
> to overall coverage
> - ignore/illegal VALUES do not effect transitions.
> 
> - Ray
> 
Received on Mon Feb 13 09:28:56 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:29:09 PST