Re: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-bc] potential command line option

Cliff wrote:
>Can we all just agree that Cliff was an idiot?! And that I apparently I 
>made mistakes in the BNF?

If the only issue here was whether there was a mistake in the BNF or
whether it matched the original intent, then I would agree.  However,
there are reasons for wanting configs to be separate, independent of
whether the current BNF says they are.  In fact, I filed the GNATS
item suggesting that configs be disallowed in source files before
looking at the BNF and discovering that they technically were already.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com