Hi Francoise,
The erratum 254 was brought up by sv-bc discussion and
at the p1800 WG meeting last week was approved as well.
We can place this on high priority for further discussion
and clarification at our next meeting.
I will ask the champions to start the discussion through email,
this should give us the background to the issue as well as
further details to the requirements.
Regards,
- Mehdi
-----Original Message-----
From: Francoise Martinolle [mailto:fm@cadence.com]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 12:51 PM
To: 'Mehdi Mohtashemi'; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] CANCEL meeting on Monday Feb 14 2005
Mehdi,
I thought that there would be some discussion around the uses of '{} for
queues and string
rvalues. As you may know, BC has identified that the syntax of some
examples of the
queues and string sections are not specified anywhere in the LRM.
The current specifiction for assignment patterns defined in the latest
proposal of
254 does not allow to do "insertions" of queues or strings inside an
assignment pattern.
What is the EC plan regarding this?
It seems like a nice capability to have but is not well specified in the
LRM.
Francoise
'
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Mehdi
Mohtashemi
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 3:13 PM
To: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] CANCEL meeting on Monday Feb 14 2005
Importance: High
Hi,
There will be no meeting for sv-ec on Monday Feb 14th, 2005, due to
DVCon05.
The next regularly scheduled meeting for sv-ec will be Monday February
28th,
2005.
Neil and I will keep the committee posted if there are any changes and
any
need for setting up a meeting in between.
Regards,
- Mehdi
Received on Fri Feb 11 13:22:37 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 11 2005 - 13:22:44 PST