Hello,
So I have no problem if we leave this as is.
I agree, this can be left as it is. There is no harm in allowing
.sample() to be called even if clocking event is specified.
I believe we all agree on the second issue: the sample method
must
be applied to a covergroup instance. Should we submit an errata
to
update the table? It's certainly a minor correction.
This should definitely be clarified. In fact, if we can quickly review
the table to see any other discrepancies, that will be great.
Regards,
Sandeep.
Received on Sat Feb 5 04:35:19 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 05 2005 - 04:36:08 PST