Re: [sv-ec] 1800 draft 3 review

The main item that needs to be completed ASAP is for the assignee
of each Acknowledged erratum to check whether Draft 3 accurately
implements the details of the approved proposal. No SV-EC votes
are required for this step of the process.

    4 Ray
    6 Arturo
    7 Arturo
    8 Ray
    9 Dave
   25 Neil
  172 Ray
  173 Arturo
  175 Mehdi
  231 Surrendra
  250 Mehdi
  252 Arturo
  260 Francoise

If you are satisfied with the editorial implementation of your
assigned erratum, update the erratum to Closed and Fixed.
If you find an editorial problem, assign it back to SV-LRM and
send some e-mail about it to Stu, Mehdi, Neil and Karen --

    http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/2639.html

-- Brad

p.s. After going through some of my assigned errata for SV-BC, I can
report that Stu has done an excellent job. The only problem I've
found so far was caused by my own neglect to add blue to highlight
an addition.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org]On Behalf Of
Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 9:24 AM
To: 'Mehdi Mohtashemi'; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] 1800 draft 3 review

 
Mehdi,

I may have missed some email from you regarding this. But I am
wondering if there is a plan for review of draft 3 of the LRM and in
particular
to verify that the changes have been well incorporated in draft 3.
I am sorry if I missed an email from you on this subject.

Francoise
    '
Received on Wed Jan 19 13:17:59 2005