[sv-ec] RE: [sv-champions] Champions meeting 1/4/05

Francoise,

I'm not sure what you are looking at.
The proposal I see for 275 is clearly different than 334,
and clearly indicates for each item which errata are the source of the
proposed changes.

Regarding your first friendly amendment, I don't see the "Reading" you mention.

Regarding the second, I already commented that the second half of the
sentence is redundant.

Thanks,
Shalom

On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Francoise Martinolle wrote:

>
> I noticed that the proposal for 275 looks identical to the proposal for 334.
> I think that the intention indicated by Mehdi in the bugnotes of 275 was to
> close 334, 197, 203 and 271 and put the total proposal for the string
> changes into 275. I
> don't think that the data base reflects the final status of these errata.
>
>
> A few minor friendly amendments to the current proposal of 275:
>
> 275:
> In the changes in paragraph 3.7. a space is missing space between period and
> "Reading":
> string.Reading an element of a string yields a byte.
>
> CHANGE : if the second argument to putc is zero, the string is unaffected:
> if c is zero, then str is unchanged.
>
> TO:
>
> if the second argument to putc is the value 0, the string is unaffected: if
> c is the value 0, then str is unchanged.

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary