RE: [sv-ec][URGENT] email ballot #4, on Erratum 275, voting closes on 15 Dec 2004

I vote yes on all issues related to Erratum 275.
Surrendra
At 04:57 PM 12/14/2004 -0800, you wrote:
>Hi Paul, and all
> Since the proposal was updated by Arturo based
>on the comments from the group, I would ask everyone
>to review the modified proposal and vote on the erratum 275.
>For those who have voted No, if the new proposal
>addresses those concern, please reconsider your vote.
>For those who have yet not voted, please send in
>your vote as soon as possible.
>thanks,
>- Mehdi
>[The email ballot is appended below. The modified proposal
> from Arturo, is attached]
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mehdi Mohtashemi" <Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.COM>
>To: <sv-ec@eda.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11:53 PM
>Subject: [sv-ec][URGENT] email ballot #4, on Erratum 275, voting closes
>on 15 Dec 2004
>
>
>
> Subject: special email vote ballot on Erratum 275
>
> All,
> After reviewing erratum 334 (null bytes in string variable),
> it became clear that erratum 275 needed to be looked at more carefully
> with the intention of making the necessary correction and placing
> it for vote. Neil and I feel that with the attached proposal,
> we now have cleared all ambiguities in the original text of
> erratum 275 (which was collection of items) and are asking
> for an email vote.
> Please carefully review the attached proposal (also uploaded
> into the database). Based on the fact that items 1, 2 and 5
> require written proposals, and items 3, 4, 6, 7 are clarification
> and are resolved based on the approval of items 1,2 and 5 of
> the 275, we have structured the ballot into 3 individual votes
> on items 1,2 and 5. Item 8 is also placed for vote, we are
> requesting that there will be a new erratum created with
> normal priority to address this. If all these 4 items receive
> pass votes, the erratum 275 will be closed and a new erratum
> for item 8 will be created.
>
>Proposal for item 1: The type of a single character within a string
> is byte.
>Proposal for item 2: The putc method has only one prototype:
> task putc( int i, byte c );
>Proposal for item 5: Typo in example, example should be modified
>
>Proposal for item 8: Usage of word string: Create a new erratum
> for this, and close 275 if all items above
>pass.
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/
>
> Please consider voting early on this, so we can close it by
> possibly December 14, 2004.
>thanks,
>- Mehdi
>
>
> Please note that any NO vote requires a reason to be stated.
> Also consider voting early as December 1st is the deadline set
> by P1800 to get all the results.
> Eligible voters as of our last meeting, December 6, 2004 are:
>------------------------------------------------------------
> Alex Wakefield
> Arturo Salz
> Bill Paulsen
> Brad Pierce
> Dave Rich
> Don Mills
> Francoise Martinolle
> Neil Korpusik
> Ray Ryan
> Steven Sharp
> Surrendra Dudani
>
>===============Erratum 275, =========
>
> Please respond to the items in this erratum, place an X in the
> appropriate box and place explanation for No vote.
>
> Errata 275 (proposal uploaded 12/8/2004, also attached)
> item 1. The type of a single character within a string is byte
>____ Yes ____ No
>
> item 2: The putc method has only one prototype: task putc( int i,
>byte c );
>____ Yes ____ No
>
> item 5: Typo in example, example should be modified
>____ Yes ____ No
>
> item 8: Usage of word string: Create a new erratum
> for this, and close 275 if all items above
>pass
>____ Yes ____ No
>
>================================================================
>

**********************************************
Surrendra A. Dudani
Synopsys, Inc.
377 Simarano Drive, Suite 300
Marlboro, MA 01752

Tel: 508-263-8072
Fax: 508-263-8123
email: Surrendra.Dudani@synopsys.com
**********************************************
Received on Wed Dec 15 07:32:37 2004