These are my votes for the updated proposal that Arturo sent out.
It looks like all of the objections pointed out by others have now
been resolved. Note that some of the objections raised were for items
that didn't pertain to this proposal.
For those that have outstanding no-votes, please reconsider your position
based on this new proposal.
> ===============Erratum 275, =========
>
> Please respond to the items in this erratum, place an X in the
> appropriate box and place explanation for No vote.
>
> Errata 275 (proposal uploaded 12/8/2004, also attached)
> item 1. The type of a single character within a string is byte
> __xx__ Yes ____ No
>
> item 2: The putc method has only one prototype: task putc( int i,
> byte c );
> __xx__ Yes ____ No
>
> item 5: Typo in example, example should be modified
> __xx__ Yes ____ No
>
> item 8: Usage of word string: Create a new erratum
> for this, and close 275 if all items above
> pass
> __xx__ Yes ____ No
>
> ================================================================
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Korpusik Tel: 408-720-4852 Staff Engineer Fax: 408-720-4850 Frontend Technologies - ASICs & Processors (FTAP) Sun Microsystems email: neil.korpusik@sun.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tue Dec 14 11:52:31 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 14 2004 - 11:52:42 PST