RE: [sv-ec] email ballot -- closes midnight October 7.2004

Eugene,

The following is from the Operating Guidelines (email to sv-ec from Karen Pieper 8/27).

C. Email vote
a. A email vote can be called by the chair/co-chair
b. The period for response will be one week (can be adjusted by agreement before the vote to a different period within committee)
c. Any negative vote will force the issue to be discussed and voted on at a committee meeting. A negative vote must be accompanied with a clear description of the reasoning behind it; if it is not, the negative vote will be invalid
d. If there are no negative votes and half of the eligible voters respond with an accept vote then the motion will be passed (the Chair of the committee is not eligible to vote on email votes)
e. The purpose of this is to pass items that are non-controversial and to reduce the time required to handle them in meetings.

PS. At this point it looks to me like most of the issues in the current call for email vote will need to be addressed at a committee meeting.

- Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of eugene zhang
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:23 PM
> To: Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] email ballot -- closes midnight October 7.2004
>
> Who is clear about the rules here? Majority, 2/3 approval?
> Should there be a column called 'reason'
> Or 'why' with simple choices like (un-important, useful,
> nice-to-have), any suggestions?
>
> -Eugene
>
>
>
> Errata
> 7 Clarification to 20.4.1, new 20.10
> ____ Yes ____ No
>
> 8 Randsequence grammar issues
> ____ Yes ____ No
>
> 173 Is the order of declaration in a covergroup
> ____ Yes ____ No
>
> 197 Is a String an array
> ____ Yes ____ No
>
> 203 Section 3.7, delete the sentence "and embedded null bytes are
> included"
> ____ Yes ____ No
>
> 231 Clarify the second paragraph in Section 16.5
> ____ Yes ____ No
>
> 236 Behavior of the cycle_delay with 'Zero' value
> ____ Yes ____ No
>
> 255 include sequence_expr in Primary
>
> ____ Yes ____ No
> ==============================================================
> ==========
> ====
> ==
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Oct 1 19:23:59 2004