RE: [sv-ec] proposal for erratum 236

 Surrendra,

I would like to add a friendly ammendment to you proposal to make clear that the clarification applies to zero cycle delay.

I recommend changing your sentence,

 "When the program execution reaches a cycle delay statement, the execution continues if there is a clocking event."

TO

 "When the program execution reaches a zero cycle delay statement, the execution continues if there is a clocking event."

Also, the proposal needs to be added to the errata in the Mantis database.

Thanks,
Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Surrendra Dudani
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 1:52 PM
> To: sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ec] proposal for erratum 236
>
> Attached is the proposal for erratum #236.
> Surrendra
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> Surrendra A. Dudani
> Synopsys, Inc.
> 377 Simarano Drive, Suite 300
> Marlboro, MA 01752
>
> Tel: 508-263-8072
> Fax: 508-263-8123
> email: Surrendra.Dudani@synopsys.com
> **********************************************
>
Received on Fri Oct 1 12:03:22 2004