How is cumulative (type) coverage affected by the dynamic
creation/destruction of covergroups.
For example:
Given covergroup A:
1. create A1, instance of A with per_instance=0
- at this point, the cumulative/type coverage of A should reflect A1's
coverage
2. create A2, instance of A with per_instance=1
- at this point, the cumulative/type coverage of A should reflect A1 and
A2 (?)
3. destroy A2
- at this point, how is the cumulative/type coverage of A calculated?
does A2 contribute in any way now that it has been destroyed?
4. destroy A1
- at this point, how is the cumulative/type coverage of A calculated?
does A1 contribute in any way now that it has been destroyed?
Received on Thu Mar 11 12:37:34 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:37:37 PST