RE: [sv-ec] LRM Changes 249 & 265


Subject: RE: [sv-ec] LRM Changes 249 & 265
From: David W. Smith (dwsmith@synopsys.com)
Date: Fri Feb 20 2004 - 13:22:37 PST


Done and posted.

 

Regards

David

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefen Boyd [mailto:stefen@boyd.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 1:09 PM
To: David W. Smith
Cc: sv-ec@eda.org; 'Brad Pierce'
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] LRM Changes 249 & 265

 

At 12:31 PM 2/20/2004 -0800, David W. Smith wrote:

Hi Stefen,

Please check the latest change for Section 4.6.1 that is on the SV web site. I believe we found, and fixed, all of the references to
the unused variable.

David,

Looks much better. Can we consider including spaces in
both [ expression ] and (expression)? The way it's written
suggests that white space is handled differently in each
of these... I'm sure it doesn't, so could we use ( expression )
instead?

Stefen



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Feb 20 2004 - 13:30:33 PST