Subject: [sv-ec] FW: ERR 16, ERR 17 discussion/clarification
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 11:02:33 PDT
David W. Smith
Synopsys Scientist
Synopsys, Inc.
Synopsys Technology Park
2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
Hillsboro, OR 97124
Voice: 503.547.6467
Main: 503.547.6000
FAX: 503.547.6906
Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
<http://www.synopsys.com/> http://www.synopsys.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Mehdi Mohtashemi [mailto:mehdi@Synopsys.COM]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:59 AM
To: David W. Smith
Subject: RE: ERR 16, ERR 17 discussion/clarification
Hi David,
Here is discussion on ERR-16 and ERR-17.
Regards,
- Mehdi
_____
for ERR-16
There is a contradiction, clarification is stated further in the
fourth and fifth paragraphs of section 5.4.
LRM Changes recommended: change the sentece to
page 51 (final.pdf section 5.4), second paragraph:
FROM:
A variable can be declared with an initializer, which must be a constant
expression.
int i = 0;
TO:
A variable can be declared with an initializer, for example:
int i = 0;
for ERR-17
[page 52 (final.pdf section 5.5) fourth paragraph
The statement "If an initializer is used, the keyword static must be
specified
to make the code clearer." is not needed in the LRM.
LRM changes recommended: Remove the sentence from the fourth paragraph,
changes to:
Data declared in a static task, function block defaults to a static
lifetime and a local scope.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Sep 29 2003 - 11:04:34 PDT