Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Motorola vote on sending the standard to the board
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 14:09:23 PDT
Michael,
Done. It will be posted (in a little while when I post some other items) as
Post-4.
Regards
David
David W. Smith
Synopsys Scientist
Synopsys, Inc.
Synopsys Technology Park
2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
Hillsboro, OR 97124
Voice: 503.547.6467
Main: 503.547.6000
FAX: 503.547.6906
Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
http://www.synopsys.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Burns [mailto:Michael.Burns@motorola.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 1:48 PM
To: david.smith@Synopsys.COM
Cc: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: Fwd: [sv-ec] Motorola vote on sending the standard to the board
Hi David,
Could you add addressing the individual thread control issue to the list of
post-3.1 issues?
Thanks,
Mike
------- Start of forwarded message -------
From: "Michael Burns" <Michael.Burns@motorola.com>
To: <sv-ec@eda.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: [sv-ec] Motorola vote on sending the standard to the board
Hi,
Motorola votes "yes" on sending the latest System Verilog 3.1 to the
Accellera board for approval, with the following comment:
-- We're unhappy that the syntax for spawning child threads appears to
be making it difficult to define a syntax extension that will allow
control (i.e. killing) of individual threads, recognizing that the
existing syntax was inherited from the earlier standard. The lack
of an individual thread control mechanism may limit our adoption of
SV3.1.
Mike Burns
Motorola
------- End of forwarded message -------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 24 2003 - 14:12:46 PDT