Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Motorola vote on sending the standard to the board
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 13:30:35 PDT
> From: "Michael Burns" <Michael.Burns@motorola.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> Motorola votes "yes" on sending the latest System Verilog 3.1 to the
> Accellera board for approval, with the following comment:
>
> -- We're unhappy that the syntax for spawning child threads appears to
> be making it difficult to define a syntax extension that will allow
> control (i.e. killing) of individual threads, recognizing that the
> existing syntax was inherited from the earlier standard. The lack
> of an individual thread control mechanism may limit our adoption of
> SV3.1.
>
> Mike Burns
> Motorola
There was better syntax from SuperLog in the 3.0 version of SV that got
removed. That fact that it got removed tends to indicate to me that that
LRM was premature (I voted against it), and that this one is equally
premature.
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 24 2003 - 13:38:23 PDT