Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Event Proposal
From: Stefen Boyd (stefen@boyd.com)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 11:26:19 PST
At 11:08 AM 3/7/2003 -0800, Arturo Salz wrote:
>Attached is a new proposal for event (and the differences with the last
>draft).
Arturo,
As I said before, I still prefer a new event type that
behaves like an automatic weapon ("event automatic"? -
I don't know that I'd want to reserve weapon as a keyword ;-)
Mostly this is because I want to use events with event
control. I would rather pass on the triggered version of
the persistent event and just use a "NBA" style trigger.
If I can't have an automatic weapon, I guess I'll settle
for a sniper that waits until everyone thinks they're
safe... Maybe it should be a "reactive" sniper so it
can take pot shots after the testbench thinks its safe.
As to the $wait stuff... If I really have to have these
things, they should be keywords wait_xxx. I thought we
killed that part of events and the only part left to
figure out was the event (i.e. nobody like any of the
options and voted all of them down).
Stefen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 11:28:08 PST